View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Operations Accountability Ladder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam |



