View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |