View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Product Canvas | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping | ![]() Product Strategy Counter Metrics | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When product goal and feature scope don't yet fit cleanly together, it creates a shared working picture. It connects need, core features, and assumptions into a solid starting point. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Canvas, Product Assumptions, Scope Notes | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Counter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasDiscoveryScope | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity |



