View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Process Mapping | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk | ![]() Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 30-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessOperationsImprovement | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | LeanObservationProcessOperations | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |



