methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-30 min45–90 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-102-63-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresTheme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areasProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods