View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 3-10 Kunden | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |