View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Operations Standard Work Analysis |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-3 h | 1-6 Wochen | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-6 | 4-10 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | LeanProcessQuality | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |