methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage1-2 h1-2 h60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-43-103-84-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open QuestionsAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
ValidationDemandMVP
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods