View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Innovation Rapid Ideation | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 5-20 min | 4-5 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 1-20 | 5-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence |



