View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | Nutzertraffic | 4-12 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



