View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card | ![]() Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 30-60 min | 20-35 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 4-12 | 1-5 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |



