View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:PretotypingArchitecture Decision RecordLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Lean Startup
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Innovation Lean Startup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 15-45 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | Wochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 1-3 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Hypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decision |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | LeanStartupValidationMVP |



