methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for TRIZ
Innovation
TRIZ
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
20–45 min1-5 Tage1-4 h1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Small cross-functional groupNutzertraffic2-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteContradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution ConceptsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods