methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Paper scorecard with four perspectives, connected objective cards and columns for measures, targets and initiatives.
Business Strategy
Balanced Scorecard
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 hHalber Tag bis mehrere Wochen1-3 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-84-122-102-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic OptionsBalanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative MapPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tags1 shared
StrategyCompetitionMarket
StrategyMetricsExecution
StrategyMarketAnalysis
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods