methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Purposedifferent
Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h1-3 h1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-81-82-106-30 Experten
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic OptionsArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationalePESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes
Tagsno overlap
StrategyCompetitionMarket
SensemakingDecisionRationale
StrategyMarketAnalysis
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
Add more methods