methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Purposedifferent
PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h0.5-2 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-102-84-122-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
PESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsFive Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic Options
Tags1 shared
StrategyMarketAnalysis
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
StrategyCompetitionMarket
Add more methods