View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 Tage | 5-20 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1-4 | 3-20 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | EstimationEffortRisk | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |