View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Architecture Risk Storming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 2-4 h | 5-20 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 5-15 | 3-20 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | EstimationEffortRisk | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation |