View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Decision Making Option Framing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 60-120 min | 5-20 min | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 4-10 | 3-20 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | EstimationEffortRisk | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison |