View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Personas | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Decision Making RAPID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 2-8 | 1-3 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DecisionRolesGovernance |



