View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Personas |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 2-8 | 2-10 | 10-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |