methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper Kanban board with To Discuss, Discussing and Discussed columns, topic cards, votes and timer.
Facilitation
Lean Coffee
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min je Frage30-90 min60-120 min5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
6-503-205-123-20
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesPrioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action ItemsRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tags1 shared
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationAutonomyDialogue
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods