View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min je Frage | 30-90 min | 60-120 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 6-50 | 3-20 | 2-8 | 20-500+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tagsno overlap | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |



