View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min je Frage | 2-4 h | 30-90 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 6-50 | 3-8 | 3-20 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | LearningDialogueFacilitation | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability |