methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
A paper-based illustration representing Brainstorming with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Brainstorming
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration of Rapid Ideation with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Rapid Ideation
Purposedifferent
Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min je Frage30-60 min1-3 h5-20 min
Participantsdifferent
6-504-125-301-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesIdea pool, Theme clusters, ShortlistConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasIdeenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster
Tagsno overlap
LearningDialogueFacilitation
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed
Add more methods