methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
1 h bis mehrere Wochen1-6 Wochen1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-84-10NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods