methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Purposedifferent
In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min1-2 h45-120 min2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-64-122-63-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Pareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus ListAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action List7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions
Tagsno overlap
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
Add more methods