methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview90-180 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews5-12 Interviews3-83-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsKPI Tree, Owner ListGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods