View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Facilitation Mind Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 15-45 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 1-10 | 15-200 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue |



