View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Facilitation World Café |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 60-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 1-8 | 3-20 Reviewer | 12-100+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | SensemakingDecisionRationale | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking |