View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation World Café |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 15-45 min | 60-180 min | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 1-3 | 12-100+ | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue |