methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
0.5-2 Tage45-90 min30-45 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
20-500+2-53-304-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisAdvice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods