methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Outcome-Driven Innovation with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Outcome-Driven Innovation
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
HighHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Mehrere Wochen2-6 h1-4 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-6 researchers plus sample3-83-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypothesesCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods