methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Purposedifferent
When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-63-63-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadenceGQM Table, Metric ProfilesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardFlywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment Backlog
Tagsno overlap
GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
GrowthRetentionConversion
Add more methods