methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Purposedifferent
When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
60-120 min30-45 min10-20 min10-20 min je Frage
Participantsdifferent
5-123-304-100+6-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityAdvice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes
Tags1 shared
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
LearningDialogueFacilitation
Add more methods