View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Engineering Goal Question Metric | ![]() Product Strategy Counter Metrics | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-75 min | 90-180 min | 30-60 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-6 | 2-6 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Test Matrix, Test Plan | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | Counter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |



