View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 60-90 min | 5-15 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 2-10 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs |