methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-4 h1-2 h90-180 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-83-64-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsNorth Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadenceGQM Table, Metric ProfilesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tags1 shared
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods