View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points | ![]() Innovation Starbursting | ![]() Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence |



