View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Operations Barrier Analysis |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Root causeSafetyIncident | AutonomyRolesTeam |