View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Facilitation World Café | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 60-180 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 20-500+ | 12-100+ | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | LearningDialogueFacilitation |



