View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy Three Horizons | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeMappingRisk | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio |



