View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Kepner-Tregoe | ![]() Operations 8D Problem Solving | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting | ![]() Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-8 h | 1-6 Wochen | 0.5-2 Tage | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-10 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |



