View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 10-20 min je Frage | 30-90 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 6-50 | 3-20 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |