View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-90 min | 10-20 min je Frage | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-20 | 6-50 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |