View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Kano Model | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas | ![]() Business Strategy 5-Minuten VC-Check | ![]() Agile WSJF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | The 5-Minute VC Check clarifies opportunities and strategic options at the earliest idea stage. It compares problem quality, customer willingness to pay, alternatives, differentiation, and market potential, and captures the result as a VC-check note, go/sharpen/park decision, and risk list. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | VC-check note, Go/sharpen/park decision, Risk and assumption list, Next validation step | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | StartupValidationCompetition | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization |



