View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Business Strategy 5-Minuten VC-Check |  UX Research Card Sorting |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | The 5-Minute VC Check clarifies opportunities and strategic options at the earliest idea stage. It compares problem quality, customer willingness to pay, alternatives, differentiation, and market potential, and captures the result as a VC-check note, go/sharpen/park decision, and risk list. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 5-15 min | 20-45 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 1-5 | Based on research question | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | VC-check note, Go/sharpen/park decision, Risk and assumption list, Next validation step | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | StartupValidationCompetition | Information architectureNavigationStructure | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |