View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Delivery Communication Plan |  Delivery Shape Up |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-6 | 2-4 pro Pitch | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |