View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Kanban |  Operations Process Mapping |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 1-3 h | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-10 | 1-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | FlowVisual managementDelivery | ProcessOperationsImprovement | ForecastingFlowDelivery | LeanObservationProcessOperations |