View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Kanban |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 5-15 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-20 | 1-8 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | FlowVisual managementDelivery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ForecastingFlowDelivery | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |